Q Report is for Theory Evaluation to nursing theory and practice,status of superiority & precedence includes work division Home, - Theory Evaluation to nursing theory and practice Theory Evaluation to nursing theory and practice The nursing is a profession of McEwen which is considered to be a major profession that is important for the different reasons. The profession includes the learned vocation or the occupation where the status of superiority and the precedence includes the division of work. The occupations generally require the different training levels or the educational standards that are depending upon the varied levels of skill. The professions are valued under the factors that are for the different services which are defined through controlling and authority over the training and education. The characteristics of a profession are depending upon the autonomy to control professional activities. The professional responsibilities are for the work that includes the clergy, law and the medicine. The educational standards for the nurses is not yet standardized that persists on the hindering professionalization. The altruistic services and the code of ethics includes the requirements for practice where the disciplines are about structure and tradition. The characteristics of disciplines and tradition with determining the methods about the phenomenon. The classification of the academic disciplines have been proposed with the basic sciences and the humanities that are determined for both. The science and philosophy highlights on the theoretical explanations with the inquiry and the processes are related to methodological standards that are for sustaining the knowledge plan. The science is characterized through systematic inquiry with relying on the empirical observation that helps in convincing the consensual and informed opinions. There are differences based on the human and natural sciences where the field of psychology and sociology will help in extending to the economics and the political sciences. The science and the philosophical schools of thoughts are determined with paradigms and worldviews that dominate on the rationalism, empiricism and the human science. a. The theory is for the hypothesis where there are good predictions which are made for handling the work. The bad theories generally end up in making the bad predictions and the hypothesis. The theory needs to focus on making the scientific explanations which are important. Here, the evaluators need to discuss and gather the information to contribute towards the programs and the results based on the survey, interviews and the reviews. The goal is mainly for seeking the data and then providing the evidence about the external factors which might be influenced through the results that are achieved (Walton, 2014). b. The experiments are for designing the hypothesis tests where the observations are based on deriving the explanations and then observing the solar eclipse with testing Einstein theory of relativity with the other studies. There are experiments based on the theory-based approach which involves the comparisons of the groups that could be for handling the theory of change. This also includes the other data gathering techniques where the key informant interviews are effectively able to trust and test the elicit theory alternatives where the key informants might have to discuss about the other relevant influential factors. c. The results are considered to be a proof or the disprove of the hypothesis where there are observations which need to be carried and properly examined for determining the scientific explanations that needs to be worked upon. The supernova studies includes the showing of the rates with universal predictions that are set through expansion with working over the testing on the explanations. The results are evaluated and then worked out for evaluating the theory. Theory of evaluation highlights on the program theory and evaluation which was mainly started in the mid of 1990 where there were analysis of the theories for motivating of programs and other initiatives. The focus is on generating the knowledge about the effective program that will help in understanding about the environmental and the organizational psychology. The industrial standards work on the processes and interventions which require an effective change (Hunter et al., 2016). The evaluation is based on the probabilities and the challenges for properly evaluating the complex community initiatives. Here, the agreements are made on the stakeholders of the complex community initiatives where the assumptions are based on explaining about the mini-steps to the long-term goals of interests. The evaluations help in planning and then strengthening the ability for claiming the credit for a better outcome. The history includes the change approach where the evaluations are based on working towards value and potential applications effectively. The research helps in focusing over the international development and the public health that would bring major change to the promotions and the clarifying standards. The realistic forms and adequate resources need to focus on the actionable theory which can easily be communicated through the key audiences.