Compare and contrast this with the treatment for assets that are not qualifying assets

Question 1: Pearson Ltd is an Australian listed company. Its results for the financial year ending 30 June 2023 have exceeded expectations-profit before tax is $11.194 million and income tax expense is $2.216 million. As at 30 June 2022, there were 11.700 million ordinary shares on issue. On 11 May 2023, 4.225 million further ordinary shares were issued at a price of $2.99-paid to $2.4. The partly paid shares carry rights to dividends in proportion to the amount paid relative to the total issue price.

Required:
Calculate the basic EPS for Pearson Ltd for the year ending 30 June 2023.

ANSWER:

Computation of EPS

From the above discussion, it can be concluded that the Basic EPS for June 2023 is 0.5461

Question 2: Explain the ‘qualifying asset' and how do we treat exchange rate differences relating to the acquisition of qualifying assets? Compare and contrast this with the treatment for assets that are not qualifying assets?

ANSWER:
Qualifying assets can be described as those assets which take a certain period of time to make themselves prepared to be used in the future. For example, building and other plants and machinery that are under construction are few examples of a qualifying asset as it would take a certain period of time to complete the total construction process. After the same, it is possible to use those buildings and plant and machinery for business purposes. However, there are certain intangible assets as well that form part of qualifying assets, provided those intangible assets are undergoing the development process.

Exchange rate treatment at the time of acquiring a qualified asset

The difference in exchange rates that is directly related to the acquisition or construction of a qualifying asset should be capitalized as part of that asset. The amount of exchange rate to be capitalised, on the other hand, must be certified according to accounting standards. It is commonly observed that only those exchange rate differences are capitalized, implying that the corporation will benefit financially from incurring these charges (Sakawaet al., 2021).
Exchange rate treatment at the time of non-qualifying asset acquisition

If an exchange rate difference arises at the time of acquisition of a non-qualifying asset, and it is observed that the item was initially recorded at a different value, then in that case it is very much essential on part of the accountant to recognize the exchange difference as an income or an expense, as the case may be, in the period when the exchange rate difference takes place.

Related :-

Q Derive the standard version of CAPM derive the standard version of capm - Does the multi-index model predict returns better than the single-index model? Explain

Q Explain the momentum effect explain the momentum effect - determine if stock prices respond efficiently to information. What did Fama find?

Q Explain the test by Litzenberger and Ramaswamy explain the test by litzenberger and ramaswamy - Explain the test by Litzenberger and Ramaswamy of the Post-Tax (i.e. after-tax) form of CAPM

Q Describe the three-tier design of demilitarized zone describe the three-tier design of demilitarized zone (DMZ), and further extend on how a VLAN can prevent all the servers in the DMZ

Q How the lease liability and a right-of-use asset would be recognised how the lease liability and a right-of-use asset would be recognised - Discuss If a decision is made to abandon an area of interest.

Q Explain the qualifying asset explain the qualifying asset and how do we treat exchange rate - Compare and contrast this with the treatment for assets that are not qualifying assets?

Q What costs should be included in cost of inventory what costs should be included in cost of inventory of an entity involved in the extractive industries - HI6025 Accounting Theory And Current Issues

Q What is the suitability of DoS in this scenario what is the suitability of dos in this scenario - What is the suitability of DoS in this scenario? Explain and justify your answer.

Q Action against the company for unpaid wages action against the company for unpaid wages - initiated action against the company for four weeks' unpaid wages but not his unpaid subsidy

Q Is their company insolvent? is their company insolvent? - Amanda and Emilia do not know what to do. Is their company insolvent? If it is, what action would you advise them to take?